Post Season/Regular Season, not the same team, but the same team

I certainly don’t want to overreact with regards to game one, but I will. The Cavs are no Thunder, after the Western Conference Finals this game seemed like a regular season game, where the Warriors won 73.In the days leading up to the game, the idea that his Cleveland team was completely changed from the team that was dominated by Golden State in the regular season, which the Warriors average margin of victory was 17, was unfounded. Yes they had a new coach, added Channing Frye and seemed to have a new style of offense, but, the Cavs shot 7-21 from three which was 5 three’s fewer then they averaged against the Warriors in the regular season.  Frye was irrelevant attempting only one shot and this offense still didn’t produce.
Point being, the Cavs weren’t drastically different then they were in the regular season. They lost by 15, shot less three’s, Channing Frye was forgettable and it was more of the same. I picked this series in 5 for the Warriors and maybe sold them short. RIP Cavs.

NBA Finals Game 1, Bench Dominated

Jonathan Tjarks from theringer.com:

“Game 1 offered a specific reminder of last year’s championship bout: the Finals MVP wasn’t any of the three marquee names on the Warriors roster. On a night when Steph Curry and Klay Thompson combined for 20 points on 8-for-27 shooting, the Warriors bench more than made up the difference in Golden State’s 104–89 win over Cleveland. Shaun Livingston, Andre Iguodala, and Leandro Barbosa scored 43 points on 18-for-24 shooting; Barbosa’s net rating for the game was comically high after a perfect 5-for-5, 11-points-in-11-minutes performance; the Warriors were dominant in the 26 minutes that Iguodala and Livingston shared the court — and those gaudy numbers still might understate the bench’s impact on the game.”

The extra effort to stop Curry and Thompson left easy buckets for the role players.  It is looking bleak in Cleveland.

LeBron Vs. Steph, Part 2: How legacies are defined

LeBron vs Curry

Michael Lee of The Vertical:

“I don’t get involved in all of that,” James said. “Underdog, overdog, whatever the case may be. It’s stupidity. … We’re better built to start the Finals than we were last year. Doesn’t matter who it’s against.”

If the opponent weren’t Curry, James might’ve sounded believable. James has been denied a rival for most of his career. The difference in age made it hard for it to truly be Paul Pierce and the difference in age and position made it impossible for Tim Duncan, despite three Finals meetings. Curry, nearly three years James’ junior, presents a threat that neither James nor anyone else in the league could’ve foreseen – the uninvited guest looking to crash the party (again) and own the whole house.

Three years removed from his last NBA title and MVP award, James has never had a better opportunity to regain the standing he has yet to fully relinquish. Knocking off James for a second time would give Curry the respect that somehow continues to elude him. The motivations are different, but the quest to cement legacies remains the same.

This series is must see.  I love watching the best two players in sports meet up for the biggest stakes.